Seismic History
|
|||||
|
|
|
Excerpts from Dan’s 1984 analysis of skateboard steering dynamics.
|
|
Like in the mid-1970s and mid-1980s, all-around skateboarding is once again enjoying a renaissance. Approaches that were considered “alternative” throughout most of the 1990s – such as longboarding, slalom, downhill, all-purpose cruising, and flatland freestyle – are now mainstream. Seismic Skate Systems is proud to have helped propel that movement. Since 1994, when turning on skateboards was considered highly unfashionable, our trucks have offered the world’s most progressive carving performance. For even longer, we’ve pro-actively supported carving, racing, and freestyle by writing for magazines, lobbying movers-and-shakers in mainstream skateboarding, and helping produce elite competitions.
Two years after graduating, and at the height of his professional skateboard career, Dan teamed up with a machine tool builder in his hometown of Rockford, Illinois. Together they developed an assortment of prototypes for advanced trucks, all incorporating metal springs set at a 90-degree angle to a fixed steering axis. The goal was to create sharper steering with better energy return.
Simultaneously, Dan began to expand his mathematical model of skateboard steering performance to encompass control dynamics. Through kinematic and force-vector analysis, he modeled the relationships between spring power and the skateboarder’s motion forces, determining the precise mathematical relationships amongst literally every variable relevant to truck performance.
These variables include: numerous key dimensions of the truck itself; carefully-measured average values for wheel diameter, wheel clearance, wheel base, deck width, and skater size; the tilt angle of the deck; the lean angle of the rider; the lateral distribution of the skater’s weight; forward velocity; and the coefficient of friction between wheels of average hardness and average riding surfaces.
After his Illinois partner’s fortunes took a turn for the worse, Dan joined forces with a group of German manufacturers. A four-year period of intensive development work began.
| Through careful study and scientific experiment (including video analysis of skaters making turns at varying speeds), Dan then developed original theories on the determinants of optimal skateboard steering control, as well as theories on the relationship of turning radius with velocity, knee bend, and deck weighting. He also corroborated his research with the only professors of engineering in the world to have studied the dynamics of skateboard turns. Dan had developed the world’s most advanced scientific model of skateboard carving dynamics. But by then his equations had grown so complex that even the most powerful calculators could not efficiently solve them. As so-called ‘transcendental’ equations, serious computing horsepower is needed to progressively zero in on appropriate values for the assorted variables. |
|
|
|
Dan’s only recourse was to program his work into Mathematica, a sophisticated mathematical analysis program developed by Wolfram Research. This let him calculate spring rates that create an optimal relationship between the skater’s weight shifts and the truck’s steering response. (A spring’s rate profile indicates its power throughout its compressive range.) |
|






